Rajiv's advocacy, knowledge of the law and persistence has been outstanding. His ability to think on his feet is also impressive. There is no doubt that he is a rising star.Jenna Ide, Thomas Mansfield Solicitors Limited
Rajiv has experience of cases involving road traffic accidents, employers’ liability and stress at work. He regularly appears in the county courts and also has a busy paperwork practice drafting pleadings, advices and schedules of loss.View full profile >>
Kumulchew v Starbucks ET Case no 2201217/2014
Ms Kumulchew is employed as a Qualified Shift Supervisor at a Starbucks store. She is dyslexic and struggles with reading, spelling and comprehension with information. She was disciplined for “falsifying” a health and safety book. Ms Kumulchew maintained that she had made a mistake which was attributable to her dyslexia. This was largely ignored. Ms Kumulchew also did various protected acts. The tribunal found that Ms Kumulchew was victimised, subjected to detriments as a result of whistleblowing and discriminated against on the grounds of her sex and disability. The case has raised considerable awareness of dyslexia in the workplace.
Frank Warren v Nathan Cleverly (High Court)
Rajiv is instructed as junior counsel to act for Frank Warren in a contractual dispute against the former professional boxer, Nathan Cleverly.
Ellis v Meltzer (Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery))
Rajiv is instructed as junior counsel and acts for the Appellant in an appeal concerning the law of unjust enrichment. Rajiv drafted the Grounds of Appeal.
LBB v Ms YU and W4C Limited (High Court, William Davis J)
Rajiv obtained an interim mandatory injunction requiring Ms YH to remove a priority search on a piece of land and an interim prohibitory injunction precluding Ms YH from registering future priorities in respect of the land. Ms YH failed to comply. Rajiv returned to the High Court and obtained a further injunction, this time against the Land Registry, requiring the Land Registry to remove the priority. The priority was thereafter swiftly removed. As a result of Rajiv’s efforts the sale of the land was completed.
Kamara v MCCH (UKEAT /0221/16/RN) (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Rajiv acted for the Respondent, MCCH, which is a charity that provides support to people with learning disabilities, autism and mental health needs. Mr Kamara was employed as a case worker. A complaint was made by the mother of a service user about the manner in which Mr Kamara had cared for her disabled son. The matter was investigated, and Mr Kamara was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct. Mr Kamara brought an Employment Tribunal claim containing various allegations, one of which was that his dismissal was an act of race discrimination. Rajiv successfully obtained a strike out of all of the claims brought by Mr Kamara on the basis that the claims had no reasonable prospects of success. Mr Kamara appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Rajiv again successfully argued that Mr Kamara’s appeal had no reasonable prospects of success.
If you would like to instruct Rajiv Bhatt or would like help or advice in doing so, please call and talk to our excellent clerking team, led by senior clerk Alan Kilbey MBE. Our phone number is +44 (0)20 7583 9241. Alternatively, please email us at email@example.com
For more information about our clerking team, please click here for the clerks page.
Prior to coming to the Bar Rajiv trained as a commercial solicitor at the international law firm Reed Smith LLP. Whilst at Reed Smith, Rajiv was involved in the high profile age discrimination case of John McCririck v Channel 4 and IMG Media (Case no: 2200478/2013). Rajiv also worked on commercial disputes ranging from intellectual property to shipping, insurance and finance law. Rajiv’s experiences at Reed Smith have allowed him to understand the needs of solicitor clients and thereby provide an effective and tailored service.
Rajiv enjoys playing and watching all manner of sports including football, cricket and swimming. He is also currently learning to play the piano.