He is smart and academically very vigorous, but brings a fierce practicality to his practice.Legal 500 2020
Andrew Arentsen’s practice is predominantly personal injury, with a focus on high value and complex claims usually involving conflicting medical evidence. It also includes professional and clinical negligence. He is also highly regarded for his work on commercial and contractual disputes, including insurance disputes as well as cases involving sports law, sporting disciplinary regulation.
Personal Injury work has a particular focus on catastrophic, spinal and closed head injuries. These include cases of employers’ liability, occupiers’ liability and road traffic accidents. Specialist advice is offered in claims with conflicting, complex medical evidence for example with orthopaedic, neurological or psychiatric disputes or where pain disorders are challenged. Work is divided between Claimant and Defendant and includes extensive experience at trial and in a pre-trial advisory capacity of industrial disease litigation (including group actions) in the form of deafness, asbestosis, dermatitis, WRULD and HAVS. He is very experienced in cases of NIHL of all types and has ongoing involvement in test litigation where the applicability or otherwise of the Coles Lutman Guidelines to BT engineers exposed to tonal noise is being addressed. The acute difficulties of cases involving exposure to asbestos with mesothelioma are regularly and sensitively addressed as are the problems presented litigating high value cases worth over one million.
Clinical negligence work is for both Claimants and Defendants and has included injuries caused at birth, negligent surgical procedures and cases of mis-diagnosis.
Commercial and common law litigation includes a focus on costs and recoverability issues. Regular instructions involve a multitude of commercial contractual disputes as well as insolvency. Common law work includes cases of professional negligence with solicitors, architects and surveyors. Specialist advice is offered in respect of insurance policies and recoverability issues as well as complex cases revolving around the construction, maintenance and management of sewerage systems.
Andrew has recent and extensive experience of sports disciplinary regulation including the supervision and administration of sports clubs by governing bodies.
Andrew is listed in both The Legal 500 and Chambers UK Guide to the Bar as a leading personal injury practitioner on the Wales and Chester Circuit every year without exception since 2000.
An experienced Clinical Negligence practitioner conducting work both for Claimants and for Defendant trusts across the full range of claims including injuries caused at birth, negligent surgical procedures and cases of mis-diagnosis and failure to diagnose.
Andrew is highly regarded for his work on commercial and contractual disputes, including insurance and subrogated recovery claims. He has undertaken and has continued to undertake numerous claims for insurers to recover for domestic property damage paid out to their insured. He also undertakes commercial and common law litigation that includes a focus on costs and recoverability issues. Regular work involves a multitude of commercial contractual disputes as well as insolvency, Companies Act litigation, partnership issues and construction disputes. Common law work includes cases of professional negligence with solicitors, architects and surveyors. Specialist advice is offered in respect of insurance policies and recoverability issues as well as complex cases revolving around the construction, maintenance and management of sewerage systems.
Andrew is highly regarded for his work on insurance and subrogated recovery claims. He has undertaken and has continued to undertake numerous claims for insurers to recover for domestic property damage paid out to their insured. Specialist advice is offered in respect of insurance policies and recoverability issues.
Andrew is highly thought of for his personal Injury practice which has a particular focus on catastrophic, spinal and closed head injuries. These include cases of employers’ liability, occupiers’ liability and road traffic accidents. Specialist advice is offered in claims with conflicting, complex medical evidence for example with orthopaedic, neurological or psychiatric disputes or where pain disorders are challenged.
Work is divided between Claimant and Defendant and includes extensive experience at trial and in a pre-trial advisory capacity of industrial disease litigation (including group actions) in the form of deafness, asbestosis, dermatitis, WRULD and HAVS. He is very experienced in cases of NIHL of all types and has ongoing involvement in test litigation where the applicability or otherwise of the Coles Lutman Guidelines to BT engineers exposed to tonal noise is being addressed. The acute difficulties of cases involving exposure to asbestos with mesothelioma are regularly and sensitively addressed as are the problems presented litigating high value cases worth over one million.
Andrew has particular experience of cases involving the application of the Package Travel Regulations. He has undertaken many cases of serious injury in consequence of accidents whilst abroad.
Andrew has appeared in the leading Court of Appeal case of Lougheed v On the Beach Limited: CA, EWCA. Andrew was Counsel for the Claimant who suffered serious injury on a holiday. The claim succeeded at first instance. The Defendant denied the application of the regulations to an internet transaction of the type purchased by the Claimant. The court found that the Package Travel Regulations applied and that was not the subject of the appeal. The appeal addressed the important issue of the application of local regulations to issues of breach of duty. It is the leading case on that major issue.
Since then Andrew has been instructed on a wide range of foreign cases involving gastric illnesses, serious injuries suffered at hotels and injuries suffered whilst travelling on cruise ships and aeroplanes. He has also been instructed on cases involving the potential application of foreign jurisdictions.
Andrew has extensive experience of representing Defendant’s in cases where fraud and dishonesty are alleged at trial. More recently these have included the
successful application of Section 57 and the exceptions to the QOCS regime. He has given a number of lectures and presentations on the full legislative package now available to address fraudulent and exaggerated claims.
As a former first class rugby player Andrew has a busy practice that includes sports law. He has recent and extensive experience of sports disciplinary regulation including the supervision and administration of sports clubs by governing bodies. He was the author of an Independent review commissioned by a leading sports governing body into the licensing of its league clubs and it’s liabilities for the condition of their premises. He sits as the Chairman of the Welsh Rugby Union Independent Tribunal (from 2008 to date). The panel considers foreign player work permit applications. The Panel sits approximately 5 times each season. He has also acted as Panel Counsel to the British Boxing Board of Control Limited and was Panel Counsel to the Australian Rugby Football Union and the Georgia Rugby Football Union for the 2010 and 2012 tours.
Andrew has extensive experience of conducting inquests both in front of a single coroner and with a jury.
Over the years, he has attended around 50 inquests including deaths by road traffic and industrial accident, deaths by industrial disease, deaths of a patient in hospital, deaths in prison custody and suicides in or out of psychiatric units. He has cross examined expert and lay witnesses, including pathologists and is experienced in the very different approach to advocacy required in the coroners court.
KH v Bryan Alexander Limited
A young man suffered a catastrophic internal injury when he was crushed by machinery at work. Liability was not in dispute. He suffered horrific internal injuries that required multiple surgical procedures. His condition became worse when his aortic graft became infected. The Claimant needed an operation to remove the infected graft that would then prevent him suffering further episodes of infection and allow him to return to work. However, the surgery was very dangerous and there was a very significant risk of his death. The case settled at a JSM for c. £1 million.
Counsel for the Claimant who sustained a significant arm injury in an RTA which led to the above elbow amputation of his dominant right arm. The most interesting aspect of the case was the array of prosthetic devices that were available for use and which the Claimant now needed. These were controlled by electrical pulses and allowed the Claimant to undertake dextrous technical work. The claim settled for £2.5 million at a JSM.
MI (A protected party)
Junior counsel in a claim for in excess of £10 million led by Stephen Killalea KC. A young man suffered a severe brain injury. A case manager and professional deputy were appointed but the Claimant remained resistant to any assistance and not involved any external help by the date of trial. The parties settled the case at a joint settlement meeting for £4 million.
DO v DR
Counsel for the Defendant. The Claimant sustained a significant head injury in an RTA which led to serious ongoing problems with concentration, memory and temper. The live issues were the extent of the Claimant’s recovery and his ability to retain his employment and work in the self-employed arena. There were extensive surveillance videos admitted into evidence . Medical evidence was in direct conflict and had to be assessed in connection with occupational records. The claim was pleaded in excess of £1.5 million and settled for a small fraction of that at a JSM.
Edward Thorn v Veolia Ltd
Counsel for the Claimant. A young refuse collector suffered an horrific leg injury when he was run over by the refuse lorry that he was working with. All experts felt that he would be functionally better off if he had a below knee amputation, something the Claimant had fought against. This refusal raised questions as to his likely pattern of work, his likely care needs and the validity of the claim for a prosthetic leg. The case settled at a JSM for more than £1 million.
DK v MOD
Counsel for the Claimant who was a Royal Marine who sustained a serious spinal and intestinal injury when he fell from a rope whilst descending from a helicopter. The Defendant was his employer who admitted partial fault for the accident but alleged that the injuries were also caused by his own negligence. The claim involved complex and conflicting orthopaedic and surgical evidence. The case was listed for trial but settled at a JSM.
JPC (A protected Party through his Litigation Friend LCM) v Paul Watts
Approval before HHJ Harrison sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. Counsel for the Claimant in an approved settlement. The Claimant sustained catastrophic brain injuries when he was knocked off his bicycle into the path of an oncoming car. The claim resolved for the capital sum of £13.5 million in addition to the Defendant transferring legal title of a bungalow which they had purchased for the Claimant into his name.
W v B (Settlement at JSM)
Counsel for the Claimant in a claim by a young male passenger who sustained serious spinal injuries in a road traffic accident. The Claimant suffered incomplete tetraplegia and was left with restricted mobility and limited motor power. The claim resolved at a JSM for the gross sum of £4.9 million.
Grant v Dawn Meats
Counsel for the Defendant in the Court of Appeal in the hugely significant procedural case involving the effect of a general stay on the requirement to serve a Part 8 Claim Form.
Bates v Staples, High Court of Justice
Cardiff District Registry 7th March 2018. Counsel for the Claimant in the substantial dependency claim following the tragic death of a high achieving young father and his infant son in a road traffic accident. The claim was approved in excess of £1m.
P v The Welsh Ambulance NHS trust. High Court of Justice. Cardiff District Registry
Counsel for the Defendant in a claim brought by a motorcyclist for catastrophic injuries suffered when in collision with an ambulance. The claim was approved at a little under 4 million.
Ridell v South Humberside NHS Trust
Counsel for the Claimant. A 40 year old nurse who developed Cauda Equina which was not diagnosed and treated with the requisite speed causing the Claimant to suffer disabling neurological symptoms. The claim settled for £850k.
Various v Depuy International Limited
Counsel for a number of Claimants in claims for injury arising from the provision of metal on metal hip prostheses.
John Nicholl v Cardiff & Vale University Health Board
Counsel for the Defendant health board throughout in a claim brought by the Claimant with an allegation of injury following negligent surgery. The claim was pleaded in excess of £1 million. The claim compromised at a joint settlement meeting shortly before the trial date.
If you would like to instruct Andrew Arentsen or would like help or advice in doing so, please call and talk to our excellent clerking team, led by Chief Executive/Director of Clerking, Paul Cray. Our phone number is +44 (0)20 7583 9241. Alternatively, please email us at email@example.com
For more information about our clerking team, please click here for the clerks page.
Andrew Arentsen is known for his impressive representation of claimants and defendants in spinal, catastrophic and closed head injury litigation. He specialises in claims involving highly complex medical issues, such as neurological, orthopaedic or psychiatric disputes.
Legal 500 published the following three testimonials in their 2024 Personal Injury London and Wales editions:
“Andrew Arentsen is a standout name in the set, this year acting for the dog owner in a case, in which liability is disputed, after a financial adviser suffered a tetraplegic injury after falling from a horse, provided by a supervised riding school, which had been scared by a West Highland terrier.”
“Andrew is very personable, good with clients, and gives clear sound advice.”
“He has an ability to get straight to the crucial matters in a case and will always make a decision rather than leave things up in the air. He commands the respect of judges by nailing the important issues and has excellent client care skills.”
“Andrew is a skilled and effective advocate.” Chambers UK 2023
“Andrew is calm, thorough, has a good attention-to-detail. He is thoroughly charming to work with.” Legal 500 2023
“He is eminently sensible and pragmatic in his approach. He has a good personable manner with clients in conference and carries appropriate gravitas in court.” “Absolutely excellent, he produces very high-quality work. He is very thorough and good on his feet in trial.” Chambers UK 2022
“Andrew is a very smart advocate, who is very calm and pragmatic in dealing with complex personal injury claims.” Legal 500 2022
“He gets to the heart of the matter with the minimum of fuss and provides straightforward, no-nonsense advice. He is excellent with clients. I would have no hesitation in recommending him.” Legal 500 2020
“He is efficient and alive to the key points in his cases.” “He has a very approachable and caring manner with clients and offers pragmatic and sensible advice.”
Chambers UK 2021
‘He is smart and academically very vigorous, but brings a fierce practicality to his practice.’
Legal 500 2020
“Calm, pragmatic and approachable.” “He’s very good with clients and is extremely efficient.”
Chambers UK 2019, Personal Injury (London Bar)
He is further recognised for his ability to handle cases involving complex medical evidence. He is also experienced acting for and advising clients in contentious industrial disease claims.
“A very reliable and creative barrister who is an expert in all aspects in the field. His paperwork is timely and thorough, and his advocacy skills are pointed, direct and well considered.” “He’s impressive in court and excellent in cross-examination. He has an eye for detail and is easy to work with.”
Recent work: Acted for a claimant in a high-value claim against a construction company. The claimant had fallen from scaffolding and suffered catastrophic brain injuries as a result.
Chambers UK 2019, Personal Injury (Wales & Chester)
Continues to act in Wales-focused cases from London. He represents claimants and defendants in a range of catastrophic injury cases, and is noted for his dedication and client-oriented approach.
‘A compelling and fiercely practical advocate.’
Legal 500 2018
Strengths: “He clearly has a great intellect, is very good with clients, is very approachable, and is very good at explaining things in lay language.” “He’s a very hard-working junior, who puts a lot of time into his practice.”
Chambers UK 2017
Has a wealth of experience in noise-induced hearing loss and medical causation. Interviewees have also commented on his expertise in highways trips and slips.
Strengths: “He is very down to earth and has a great manner with clients.”
Chambers UK 2016
‘Refreshingly straight-talking and a formidable presence in the courtroom.’
The Legal 500 2016
“He is a great tactician and is very practical. He will really roll up his sleeves to look at the legal issues.”
Chambers UK 2015
“A specialist in claims where there is complex and often conflicting evidence.”
The Legal 500 2015
The entry notes the ability of Andrew Arentsen to handle numerous high-value damages claims.
Chambers UK 2014
Andrew Arentsen is “a sensible, pragmatic, and highly efficient” barrister whose personal injury practice is predominantly focused on catastrophic brain and spinal injury cases. He recently appeared in Andrew Jones v Ribbons Ltd, a catastrophic injury claim concerning an individual rendered disfigured when he caught his arm in an unguarded machine.
Legal 500 2014
The “fluent, persuasive and personable” Andrew Arentsen heads the group at Civitas Law, which has a national reputation for industrial disease claim.
Chambers UK 2013
The “brilliant” Andrew Arentsen’s honesty is recognised and appreciated by clients, who also value his “effective arguments and performances in court”. He is recommended.
The Legal 500 2013
Solicitors appreciate the “reliable and decisive” Andrew Arentsen who has recently been acting in a case which involved a nuisance and negligence claim against Welsh Water. He is also well known for representing clients in a number of RTAs.
Chambers UK 2012
Andrew Arentsen is “not afraid to make difficult decisions”.
Chambers UK 2011
Sources commend “the sound and practical” Andrew Arentsen for being “extremely approachable but also straight with you – he will tell you if you are going down the wrong route”.
The Legal 500 2011
Andrew is a keen skier and father of 3 teenage children.
Cycled in 2012 from Yosemite to San Francisco as part of the Velindre Cancer Charity Cycle that raised over £500,000 for cancer services at the Velindre Centre in Cardiff. Then persuaded to complete the second Velindre Cancer Charity Cycle from Boston to New York in September 2014 which raised close to £750,000.
Cycled the 2009, 2022 and currently training for the 2023 Etape du Tour, a 120 mile stage of the Tour de France including an ascent of Mont Ventoux.
First class professional rugby player for Richmond, Newport and Glamorgan Wanderers. Cambridge Rugby Union Blue 1993. U18 Welsh schoolboy rugby international.